Mmmm, well Einstein did a lot of thinking and came up with all of his theories by ‘thought experiments’ that involved a lot of mathematical calculations. I am more of an experimental scientist – I like to collect the data and see if what we think is happening in nature is truly correct – this is what makes science so special as a way of thinking about the world – we never take anything for granted and always like to see the evidence for ourselves. So I guess I aspire to be more like Charles Darwin or Alfred Russell Wallace who both came up with the theory of natural selection by carefully observing the world around them and testing their ideas with experiments.
I don’t want to be link Einstein either – the stuff I’m trying to do can’t be theorised about, or predicted. You have to really get stuck in the lab and see what your experiments are telling you.
I agree 100% with Michelle’s answer. Biology is an experimental science based on observations, rather than theory. Therefore, I’m more inspired by Crick and Watson (discoverers of the DNA structure) than by Einstein.
I’d also like to add that science has changed a lot from Einstein’s (and Darwin’s) time. Now science is much more collaborative, and new discoveries and advances are the result of the effort of hundreds or thousands of scientists working in the same problem. Take as an example the sequencing of the human genome 10 years ago. Getting the DNA sequence of all our genes was possible thanks to a huge international collaboration, rather than the effort of a single scientist. Therefore, I feel inspired by knowing that the collaboration between scientists leads to great achievements.
Comments