Really good question. The research needs to be explained and justified fully so that the public understands why it is being done and why the public’s tax money is being spent on the research.
Through public participation children, teenagers and adults can see what the research is and why it is being done. I hope the public agree that natural language and artificial intelligence are worthy areas to study – they can see some benefits, for example in my Turing tests they might get better at deception-detection and avoid being scammed by bogus bots across the Internet. More widely, the public might learn to appreciate that artificial intelligence could improve human life through smarter machines doing the mundane and dangerous jobs. The public might also agree they should have a say in how and where artificial intelligences will be used so that there are jobs left for humans in the future.
I’m not sure if the whole public would agree with what I’m doing, but this is why it is *so* important for government etc., to vote on how much funds particular science organisations get, in order to determine where the tax payers money should be going.
Comments