Hmm, normally these names are given in retrospect – we are not necessarily aware of what is the most conspicuous feature of our generation. So, no idea.
Hopefully it would be something positive! Although currently probably the most obvious thing we are doing is destroying the natural world as we know it, so i hope it is not something to do with that
Historians tend to decide these things in later years. I expect though that because the pace of technological change has been so fast during the reign of Queen Elizabeth II our times will not be named after her (neo-Elizabethan, or whatever it would be). This is because life is very different now to what it was at the start of Queen Elizabeth’s reign. In the past things changed more slowly so it made more sense to measure the passing of time in monarchs.
I think in the near future we will do away with the monarchy, so we won’t be named after Kings or Queens any more. What do they call generations in countries like the USA that don’t have monarchs?
I think that quite soon, we will start running out of fossil fuels and this will be a massive change in society. So those people might be known as the post-carbon generation.
Comments