I’d change the human evolutionary past to make them better able to understand the impact of their actions on others. In broad terms, humans have evolved to look after a small group of people that they feel loyalty to (your family, your nationality, or your religious group). This means that, as long as our immediate group is not affected, we don’t worry about hurting others or future generations. This leads us to use up resources like water that others need much more, blowing CO2 into the atmosphere, or buying things that we know other people don’t get properly paid for. We all simply don’t think of this because our brains haven’t evolved to cope with it – I’d love to change that.
My answer is sort of similar to Vera. If I could wave a magic wand, I would get rid of disease, and ensure that there were enough resources for everyone to live happily with no suffering. I would also probably limit our reproductive rate so the earth doesn’t become (even more) overpopulated.
But without a magic wand, many of these changes could be achieved simply by redistributing wealth from the very rich people (in countries like the UK) to the desperately poor in much of the world. I would like to see that happen.
I would love to turn back time and stop the dinosaurs from going extinct to see how evolution pans out. Although humans as we are today probably would not have evolved!
On a less serious note, though, I’d love to see what would have happened if Neanderthals had survived longer and were still around today – how would humans get on with them? What would they be like?
I would just like to remove all war from the planet, and have people just get along and share. I would certainly have everyone equal, so that everyone has the same chances in life. The whole money-grabbing culture we have would also go. I’d like to see people value what is really important, such as each other and the world we share than numbers in a bank of small pieces of transition metals.
I think I know the answer to Sam’s question how human and neanderthals would get on. The species that has the upper hand would be really mean to the species that doesn’t. It happens today with people with much fewer differences than neanderthals and us, like skin colour, religion, gender, any little piddly difference really. If I could change the world I’d probably try and change this too.
Comments
Vera commented on :
I think I know the answer to Sam’s question how human and neanderthals would get on. The species that has the upper hand would be really mean to the species that doesn’t. It happens today with people with much fewer differences than neanderthals and us, like skin colour, religion, gender, any little piddly difference really. If I could change the world I’d probably try and change this too.
Sam commented on :
I fear that you’d be right. I wonder though whether neanderthals would have the same trait of being mean to humans if they had the upper hand.
Steve commented on :
Is this not one of the theories as to what happened to the neanderthals? I think it is quite a disputed fact though now.