In fact it was the patterns noticed in the reactivity of some groups of elements that inspired creation of the table more than 100 years ago.
There are patterns that you should be able to notice yourself:
On the left and centre you find metals
On the right non-metals and gasses
…and at the bottom radioactive elements
But these are only the most obvious patterns, the table is essentially *full* of subtle relationships between nearby elements. In fact I would go as far to say, that it is the study of these relationships that is the fundamental aspect of the subject we call Chemistry.
Ah I see what you meant… Short answer yes (the next row would look a lot like the one above, except there would be a new ‘g-block’ between the s and f blocks)… but since the heavier the element the less stable it is (very broadly speaking) I’m not sure the row 8 elements will be around long enough to do any chemistry on them!
The was a prediction that the row 7 elements under lead (and either side) would be unusually stable… and indeed they are with half lives of around 5-30s.
Comments
The Guy (tm) commented on :
As in any patterns for predicting say, the size of the next row of the periodic table. Thanks anyway!
Ian commented on :
Ah I see what you meant… Short answer yes (the next row would look a lot like the one above, except there would be a new ‘g-block’ between the s and f blocks)… but since the heavier the element the less stable it is (very broadly speaking) I’m not sure the row 8 elements will be around long enough to do any chemistry on them!
The was a prediction that the row 7 elements under lead (and either side) would be unusually stable… and indeed they are with half lives of around 5-30s.