Hi Emily and Issy,
Animal testing for new medicines is really important. Although scientists test potential new medicines on human cells in a dish first. There is no way of knowing what will happen in the body until we test them on animals and even then sometimes medicines behave differently in humans. There are a lot of rules to make sure that animals are not unnecessarily harmed or used in experiments. There is a lot of work going on to try and improve other techniques to reduce the amount of animal testing.
I am totally against animal testing for cosmetics and laws have been passed in the UK to ban it.
Yes, until we can find something better. NC3Rs is a UK organisation looking into reducing the use of animals in science and finding alternatives that work as well: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/the-3rs
Hi, thanks for the question. That’s always a hard one for most scientists. We still do need to test on animals for new drugs and vaccines. Whether it is the best way or not, at the moment, it is the only way. I do not like it and I personally do not take a job where I physically have to work with animals. However, as a part of research in general it happens and I understand that but I second Andy, absolutely not for cosmetics etc… we have enough of those already and there is no need to test on animals for new ones
Although I don’t enjoy the idea of animal testing, it is necessary because the alternative would be testing drugs directly on humans, which, in my opinion is way worse than animal testing.
Comments